Social Security: Increased Benefits for Survivors and Disabled Spouses
A senate committee must act next: committee consideration.
This bill is supported only by Democrats and would increase government spending. Without support from the other party, it will be very difficult to pass in a divided Congress.
Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works
Surviving parents caring for a child currently lose child-in-care benefits when the child turns 16. This bill extends that to age 18, or 19 if the child is still a full-time high school student, keeping more money flowing to households with teenage children.
“by striking ``age of 16'' and inserting ``age of 18 (or, in the case of a child who is a full-time elementary or secondary school student, 19)''”
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.
Introduced in Senate
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.
The SWIFT Act aims to eliminate the 'widow(er) limit' that reduces benefits if a spouse claimed early. It would allow disabled survivors to receive 100% of benefits regardless of age and extend child-in-care benefits until the youngest child turns 19 if still in school.

Introduced by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, the SWIFT Act would broaden Social Security benefits for disabled widows and widowers by modifying age requirements and boosting benefits beyond current income earning caps.
No votes recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
SWIFT Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.