Health and Retirement Plans: New Penalties for Denying Appeals
A house committee must act next: committee consideration.
While the bill offers popular consumer protections, it faces significant opposition from the insurance industry and currently lacks broad bipartisan support.
Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works
Small businesses that sponsor group health or retirement plans, or the third-party administrators they hire, can be held jointly and severally liable for claims-handling failures. New civil penalties of up to $1,000 per participant for system-wide violations, plus daily fines for individual mistakes, raise compliance costs and legal risk for plan sponsors.
“Any person or entity that materially causes (including through failure to perform required actions) a violation described in subparagraph (A) shall be jointly and severally liable for the payment of the appropriate penalty”
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Introduced in House
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.
Rep. Summer Lee introduced the Consumer Appeal Rights Enforcement Act to give the DOL authority to impose civil monetary penalties against insurers violating federal review and appeal requirements. The bill is part of a package responding to a report on wrongful health claim denials.
Following the release of the 'Denied' report, Aimed Alliance advocated for legislative reforms like the Consumer Appeal Rights Enforcement Act to strengthen transparency and oversight, citing widespread gaps in proactive enforcement by regulators.
No votes or related bills recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
Consumer Appeal Rights Enforcement Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.