California General Election
Tuesday, November 3, 2026 · California
How to Vote
Registration Deadlines
Register to voteSame-day registration available
Voting
California
Contests
4 races on the ballot
San Diego County Assessor-Recorder-Clerk
San Diego
Candidate (Uncontested)
East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors Ward 7
East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors Ward 7
Candidate (Uncontested)
San Diego County Board of Supervisors District 4
San Diego County Board of Supervisors District 4
2 Candidates
Chula Vista City Attorney
Chula Vista
Candidate (Uncontested)
Ballot Measures
8 measures for voters to decide
California Vote Requirements for Initiatives Requiring Supermajority Votes Amendment (2026)
Vote Requirements for Initiatives Requiring Supermajority Votes Amendment
Require initiatives that change vote thresholds to supermajority votes to pass by the same vote requirement as is being proposed
A YES vote means
<p>A "yes" vote supports requiring <a href="https://ballotpedia.org/Initiated%20constitutional%20amendment">citizen-initiated constitutional amendments</a> that propose a higher vote threshold for future state or local ballot measures to meet the same higher threshold to pass (for example, a ballot initiative proposing a 60% requirement for certain other measures would itself require a 60% vote to pass).</p>
A NO vote means
<p>A "no" vote opposes requiring citizen-initiated constitutional amendments that propose a higher vote threshold for future state or local ballot measures also to meet the same higher threshold to pass.</p>
11 endorsements for YES · 10 endorsements for NO
California Second Mortgage Homebuyer Program and Revenue Bond Initiative (2026)
Second Mortgage Homebuyer Program and Revenue Bond Initiative
Establish a second mortgage homebuyer program for qualified homebuyers on qualifying homes and issue $25 billion in bonds to fund the program
A YES vote means
<p>A "yes" vote supports this initiative to:</p><ul><li>establish a second mortgage homebuyer program for qualified homebuyers on qualifying homes administered by the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA), and</li><li>authorize the CalHFA to issue up to $25 billion in bonds to fund the program.</li></ul>
A NO vote means
<p>A "no" vote opposes this initiative to establish a second mortgage homebuyer program.</p>
13 endorsements for YES
California Voter Identification, Citizenship Verification, and Registered Voter List Administration Initiative (2026)
Voter Identification, Citizenship Verification, and Registered Voter List Administration Initiative
Require voters to present government-issued identification when casting ballots and require election officials to use government data to confirm voter citizenship and report verification rates
A YES vote means
<p>A "yes" vote supports this ballot initiative to:</p><ul><li>require voters to present a government-issued ID for in-person voting or provide the last four digits of a government-issued ID designated during voter registration for mail-in voting;</li><li>require election officials to "maintain accurate voter registration lists [and]... use best efforts to verify citizenship attestations using government data” and to report each year the percentage of each county’s voter rolls that have been citizenship-verified;</li><li>require the State Auditor to audit government compliance with these requirements during odd-numbered years and report “findings and recommendations for improving the integrity of elections to the public.”</li></ul>
A NO vote means
<p>A "no" vote opposes this ballot initiative, leaving existing law in place, under which:</p><ul><li>voters are not required to present a government-issued ID when voting; and</li><li>voters must attest to their citizenship under penalty of perjury and provide identifying information when registering; election officials are not required to use government data to verify those attestations or to report citizenship verification rates.</li></ul>
11 endorsements for YES · 9 endorsements for NO
California Allow Public Financing of Election Campaigns Measure (2026)
Allow Public Financing of Election Campaigns Measure
Allow the state and local governments to create programs that provide candidates with public funds under spending limits and eligibility rules
A YES vote means
<p>A "yes" vote supports repealing the ban on public financing of campaigns, enacted in <a href="https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_73,_Funds_for_Election_Campaigns_Initiative_(June_1988)">1988</a>, and allowing the state and local governments to create programs that provide candidates with public funds under spending limits and eligibility rules.</p>
A NO vote means
<p>A "no" vote opposes repealing the ban on using public funds for election campaigns, keeping the prohibition in place with the existing exemption for charter cities.</p>
12 endorsements for YES · 1 endorsement for NO
California Limit Compensation of Healthcare Executives Initiative (2026)
Limit Compensation of Healthcare Executives Initiative
Create a compensation limit for CEOs, executives, administrators, and managers of healthcare corporations
A YES vote means
<p>A "yes" vote supports this initiative to establish a $450,000 limit on compensation (salaries, bonuses, and some benefits) for executives and managers of private hospitals, private physician groups, and public hospitals owned by special districts, adjusted annually by 3.5% or inflation, whichever is lower.</p>
A NO vote means
<p>A "no" vote opposes this initiative to establish a $450,000 limit on compensation (salaries, bonuses, and some benefits) for executives and managers of private hospitals, private physician groups, and public hospitals owned by special districts.</p>
1 endorsement for NO
California Eliminate State Officer Recall Successor Elections Amendment (2026)
Eliminate Successor Election at a State Officer Recall Election Amendment
Eliminate the successor election when a state officer is recalled, thereby leaving the office vacant until it is filled according to state law
A YES vote means
<p>A "yes" vote supports amending the state constitution to:</p><ul><li>eliminate the simultaneous election of a successor when a state officer is recalled, thereby leaving the office vacant until it is filled according to state law;</li><li>allow the recalled officer to run again for the same office at the special election, if one is held; and</li><li>authorize the lieutenant governor to fill a gubernatorial vacancy until the expired term, unless the vacancy occurred before the close of the nomination period for the next statewide election during the first two years of the governor’s term, then a special election would be called and the winner would serve the remainder of the term.</li></ul>
A NO vote means
<p>A "no" vote opposes this amendment, thereby maintaining the requirement that a simultaneous election to fill the statewide office vacancy be held at the time of the recall election.</p>
4 endorsements for YES · 1 endorsement for NO
California Two-Thirds Vote Requirement for Special Taxes and Charter City Real Estate Transfer Tax Prohibition Initiative (2026)
Two-Thirds Vote Requirement for Special Taxes and Charter City Real Estate Transfer Tax Prohibition Initiative
Require a two-thirds vote by the electorate to enact special local taxes enacted by successful citizen initiative campaigns and prohibit charter city from levying real estate transfer taxes
A YES vote means
<p>A "yes" vote supports this initiative to:</p><ul><li>amend the California Constitution to increase the vote requirement to pass citizen-initiated local special taxes from a simple majority (50%+1) to a two-thirds (66.67%) vote;</li><li>prohibit charter cities from imposing their own real estate transfer taxes, whether for general or specific purposes, above the existing statutory rate of $0.275 per $500 of value; and</li><li>invalidate any property-related special taxes previously adopted with an approval rate below two-thirds or real estate transfer taxes in charter cities.</li></ul>
A NO vote means
<p>A "no" vote opposes this initiative to increase the threshold to enact citizen-initiated local special taxes and prohibit charter cities from levying real estate transfer taxes.</p>
4 endorsements for YES
California Spending Requirements for Federally Qualified Health Centers Initiative (2026)
Spending Requirements for Federally Qualified Health Centers Initiative
Prohibit healthcare clinics, specifically federally-qualified health centers and related organizations, from spending less than 90% of their annual revenue on mission-related purposes
A YES vote means
<p>A "yes" vote supports this initiative to require nonprofit federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and FQHC Look-Alikes to spend at least 90% of their annual total revenue on expenses that advance the health center's mission.</p>
A NO vote means
<p>A "no" vote opposes this initiative to require nonprofit federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and FQHC Look-Alikes to spend at least 90% of their annual total revenue on expenses that advance the health center's mission.</p>
1 endorsement for YES · 1 endorsement for NO