Donald Trump Petitions Supreme Court to Rehear Birthright Citizenship Case

Fourteenth Amendment Birthright Citizenship·Latest event July 20, 2026

Jul 8

Donald Trump Petitions Supreme Court to Rehear Birthright Citizenship Case

President Donald Trump announced he will petition the Supreme Court to rehear a case regarding birthright citizenship. This request follows a ruling that found his executive order unconstitutional and reaffirmed that the president cannot end these rights on his own. Trump labeled the current policy a scam and cited concerns about birth tourism services near the border as a reason for the Court to reconsider its decision.

Trump targets birthright citizenship 'scam' in Supreme Court demandTrump announces long-shot bid to get Supreme Court to rehear birthright citizenship caseTrump demands Supreme Court rehearing in birthright citizenship case

Jul 4

Senator Rand Paul Proposes Constitutional Amendment to End Birthright Citizenship After Supreme Court Ruling

Following the Supreme Court's decision to uphold birthright citizenship, Senator Rand Paul is calling for a constitutional amendment to change how citizenship is granted. This move comes after the Supreme Court reaffirmed the 14th Amendment guarantee in the case of Trump v. Barbara. The court ruled 6-3 that children born in the U.S. to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens at birth. Senator Paul released a video pushing for the amendment as a way to address the issue through the legislative process rather than executive action. The court previously rejected efforts to end the practice through a presidential order. This debate highlights ongoing questions about who belongs in America as the nation marks its 250th anniversary.

Rand Paul Pushes Constitutional Amendment on Birthright CitizenshipAt 250, America is still deciding who belongsSupreme Court Upholds 14th Amendment Birthright CitizenshipCourt Rules Children of Undocumented Parents Are Citizens at Birth

Jul 3

Critics and Lawmakers Debate Birthright Citizenship Following Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision to uphold birthright citizenship has sparked intense debate among lawmakers and legal experts. While the ruling rejected attempts to end the practice by executive order, Justice Kavanaugh suggested the case might have been resolved through simple laws rather than the Constitution. Some observers argue the court's majority is not aligned with the MAGA movement's goals on immigration. Opponents of the ruling expressed concerns that the decision encourages birth tourism and the use of surrogacy networks to gain citizenship. Critics also raised questions about civic assimilation and whether the 14th Amendment was meant to cover these modern issues. Supporters of the decision maintain that the ruling affirms the definition of the American political community as an ongoing project.

Reminder: “birth tourism” and “surrogacy networks”WATCH: Controversial SCOTUS decision strikes a divide among lawmakersSome Thoughts on the Court's Opinion(s) in the Birthright Citizenship CaseSupreme Court's awful ruling encourages China's Hunan Horse to invade America

Jul 2

Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship in Trump v. Barbara Ruling

The Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to nearly all children born on American soil. Chief Justice Roberts led a five-justice majority in Trump v. Barbara, finding that birthright citizenship cannot be ended by executive order. The Court stated that only a constitutional amendment or a later judicial reversal could change this standard. Critics of the decision argue the majority misinterpreted the 14th Amendment and that the executive branch should have more authority over citizenship rules. Justice Kavanaugh agreed with the outcome but suggested Congress could potentially change citizenship laws through legislation rather than executive action. Three dissenting justices argued the amendment does not cover children of foreigners. Supporters of the ruling emphasized that birthright citizenship is a cornerstone of the Constitution that no president can undo with the stroke of a pen.

Analysis of Trump v. Barbara RulingStatement on 14th Amendment ProtectionsOpinion | Roberts Gets the 14th Amendment Wrong