Skip to content
Govbase
Govbase

Rep. Massie and Rep. Boebert Introduce Bill Requiring Warrants for Government Access to Digital Data

Surveillance Accountability Act·April 23 – April 24, 2026

4 days ago

Rep. Massie and Rep. Boebert Introduce Bill Requiring Warrants for Government Access to Digital Data

Rep. Thomas Massie and Rep. Lauren Boebert introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act. This bill would require the government to get a warrant before looking at digital data or biometric information held by private companies. Rep. Massie said the law would stop the government from using the Third Party Doctrine to spy on private records without a warrant. Currently, the government can often see data held by internet providers or banks if those companies agree to share it. The proposal was introduced during a disagreement among Republicans about surveillance laws. The bill would also allow people to sue the government if their privacy rights are violated. This effort aims to create stricter rules for how the government monitors citizens and their personal information stored online.
H.R. 8470Rep. Massie Introduces Bill Requiring Warrants for Government Access to Digital Data and BiometricsRep. Massie on the Surveillance Accountability ActThe Republican civil war over FISA explained

Who This Affects

9 groups

Hurts

Federal Employee

Federal employees involved in law enforcement, intelligence, or investigations would face new personal liability for Fourth Amendment violations. The bill explicitly makes federal employees (except the President and Vice President) subject to lawsuits if they conduct unlawful searches, creating a new legal risk that does not currently exist in a clear statutory form at the federal level.

Mixed

Criminal Record

People with criminal records or those under investigation could benefit from stronger warrant protections, as law enforcement would face higher barriers to accessing their digital data, communications, and location history. However, the bill does not change existing rights for those already convicted, and the practical benefit depends on enforcement and judicial interpretation of the new standards.

Helps

Undocumented

The bill protects 'any person within the jurisdiction' of the United States, not just citizens, meaning undocumented individuals would gain stronger protections against warrantless government surveillance, data collection, and biometric tracking. This could limit the ability of immigration enforcement agencies to use automated license plate readers or facial recognition to locate and track people without a warrant.

Visa Holder

Visa holders would benefit from the same warrant protections as citizens under this bill, since it covers any person within U.S. jurisdiction. Government agencies would need warrants to access their third-party data, track their movements, or use biometric surveillance against them.

Green Card

Permanent residents would gain clearer warrant protections for their digital data, communications, and biometric information. The bill's explicit inclusion of 'any person within the jurisdiction' ensures green card holders have a right to sue federal employees who violate their Fourth Amendment rights.

News

The Republican civil war over FISA explained

newsweek.com logonews_articleCenter

Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.