Sen. Husted Introduces Healthy Competition for Better Care Act to Lower Healthcare Costs
A senate committee must act next: committee consideration.
This bill’s path across every version that has carried it.
Reintroduced
Reintroduced from H.R. 3120 (118th), which died when its Congress ended.
H.R. 3120 (118th) →Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works
Small businesses that provide group health plans are disproportionately harmed by anticompetitive contract clauses because they have less bargaining power than large employers. By banning these clauses, the bill could help small businesses access more competitively priced insurance plans with networks designed around quality and cost, potentially reducing their employee health coverage costs.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.
Introduced in Senate
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.
U.S. Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio) introduced the bipartisan Healthy Competition for Better Care Act, designed to ban anticompetitive clauses in healthcare contracting. The legislation aims to create incentives for real competition to drive down costs for patients by removing market restrictions.

A coalition of employer advocacy groups praised the introduction of the Healthy Competition for Better Care Act. The bill targets 'all-or-nothing' and 'anti-steering' clauses that restrict competition and drive up healthcare costs for patients and employers by limiting network flexibility.
No votes recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
Healthy Competition for Better Care Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.