Congress Proposes Ending Private Immigration Prisons and Banning Detention of Children
A senate committee must act next: committee consideration.
This bill’s path across every version that has carried it.
Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works
Private prison companies and for-profit contractors that run immigration detention centers or alternatives-to-detention programs would be forced to shut down within three years. This represents a major loss of revenue for companies like CoreCivic and GEO Group. Local businesses that depend on detention facility operations in their communities would also be affected.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.
Introduced in Senate
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.

Senators failed to advance a DHS funding bill as Democrats seek limits on federal immigration agencies, including stricter use-of-force policies and oversight measures similar to those proposed in the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act amid a surge in deportations.
Following deaths in ICE custody, advocates and lawmakers point to the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act as a necessary federal reform to phase out private jails like Delaney Hall and increase accountability for facility operators like the GEO Group.
Lawmakers in several states are advancing bills to protect migrants as the federal Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act is reintroduced in Washington. The bill aims to end the private incentive to fill up prisons and combat human rights violations in immigration detention.
No votes or related bills recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.