Congress·In Committee·S. 3546

Sunset Section 230 Act

Senate Bill Would Strip Legal Shield From Facebook, YouTube, and Other Social Media Sites

Dec 17, 2025·View on Congress.gov·Read full text

Next up: A senate committeeNo action in 7 months

A senate committee must act next: committee consideration.

Legislative Progress

Senate

House

President

Law

Key Points

A bipartisan group of Senators introduced a bill to repeal Section 230, a law that currently protects internet companies from being sued for things their users post. If this bill passes, websites like Facebook, X, and YouTube could be held legally responsible for the content shared by people on their platforms.
The goal of the bill is to hold tech companies more accountable for harmful content, such as illegal activity or dangerous misinformation. By removing their 'legal shield,' lawmakers hope to encourage these companies to be more careful about what they allow on their sites.
This change would affect almost every website that allows user comments or posts. Critics warn that without these protections, websites might start deleting more content to avoid expensive lawsuits, or they might stop allowing users to post comments and reviews altogether.
The repeal would not happen right away. The bill includes a two-year delay after it is signed into law, which is intended to give the tech industry and the legal system time to adjust to the major shift in how the internet is regulated.

Technology DigitalCivil RightsEconomy Finance

Impact Analysis

Personal Impact

Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works

Small businesses that rely on user reviews, comments, or community forums — like online marketplaces, review sites, and small social platforms — would suddenly face legal liability for everything their users post. Many small tech companies and startups couldn't afford the legal costs of defending against lawsuits over user content, potentially forcing them to shut down interactive features or go out of business entirely. This would hit small platforms much harder than big tech companies that have large legal teams.

-4

ImpactCertaintyScopeDurationSentiment

-4

ImpactCertaintyScopeDurationSentiment

Milestones

2 milestones2 actions

Dec 17, 2025Senate

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.

Dec 17, 2025

Introduced in Senate

The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.

Related News

3 articles

Courthouse News Service·Feb 4

10 Things I Hate About Section 230: Joseph Gordon-Levitt urges rollback of Big Tech protections

Actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt joined Senator Dick Durbin on Capitol Hill to lobby for the Sunset Section 230 Act, which would repeal federal liability protections for social media companies. Durbin argued the bill would force tech companies to take ownership of harms like child exploitation.

Center

The Hill·Feb 4

Gordon-Levitt on Section 230 sunset bill: 'I want to see this thing pass 100 to zero'

Actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt visited Capitol Hill to advocate for the Sunset Section 230 Act, which aims to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act within two years. He emphasized the bipartisan support for the bill and urged senators to pass it unanimously to hold tech firms accountable.

Center

Northwest Newsradio·Feb 19

What is Section 230? Landmark social media lawsuit spotlights legal shield

In December, Sen. Dick Durbin and Lindsey Graham introduced the Sunset Section 230 Act, which would remove the legal protection from federal law within two years. A bipartisan group of seven senators has signed onto the bill, though it remains short of a majority.

Center

No votes or related bills recorded for this bill yet.