Congress·In Committee·S. 3533

Congress bill would require Supreme Court to explain emergency orders and disclose each justice’s vote

Shadow Docket Sunlight Act of 2025

3 months ago·View on Congress.gov

Legislative Progress

Senate

House

President

Law

Key Points

Would require the Supreme Court to publish written reasons when it grants, denies, or pauses certain early-stage court orders in appeal cases.
Would also require the Court to say, in writing, how each participating justice voted on those emergency-type decisions.
For these decisions, the Court’s written explanation must address key questions like: likely to win, risk of serious harm, fairness to both sides, and the public interest.
Does not apply to routine scheduling or administrative orders, or to decisions on whether to take a case, unless they involve pausing or granting that early relief.
The Federal Judicial Center would report to Congress every two years on whether the Court is following these transparency requirements and suggest fixes if needed.

Criminal JusticeCivil Rights

Impact Analysis

Personal Impact

How this policy affects specific groups of people

Negative Impacts(1)

Federal Employee

Hurts

Mixed Impacts(1)

Small Business Owner

Neutral

Milestones

2 milestones2 actions

Dec 17, 2025Senate

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Dec 17, 2025

Introduced in Senate

What Happens Next

Projected impacts based on AI analysis

Starting on the law’s effective date (not stated in the text; typically upon enactment unless otherwise specified).

If enacted, the Supreme Court must start issuing written reasons and listing each justice’s vote for covered emergency orders in appellate cases involving preliminary injunctions or stays.

People affected by fast-moving Supreme Court orders (like rules being paused or put back in place) would get a clearer written explanation of why, and see which justices voted which way.

Soon after enactment, so the Center can prepare the first required report.

Federal Judicial Center begins tracking whether the Supreme Court is complying with the new written-explanation and vote-disclosure requirements.

Creates a paper trail that Congress and the public can use to see whether the new transparency rules are actually being followed.

By April 1 of the first year that begins more than 180 days after enactment (exact year depends on enactment date).

First compliance report due from the Director of the Federal Judicial Center to Congress.

Congress receives an official check on compliance, plus recommendations to improve follow-through if the Court is not meeting the requirements.

Every second year after the first report, due April 1.

Ongoing compliance reports submitted every two years on April 1.

Regular updates could keep pressure on continued transparency and make it easier to spot patterns over time.

Related News

1 article

SCOTUSblog·2 months ago

SCOTUStoday for Tuesday, January 13

Newsletter includes a section (“A Closer Look: The Shadow Docket Sunlight Act”) summarizing the bill’s requirements for written explanations and public vote disclosure on emergency orders, plus arguments for/against the proposal.