Congress Proposes Bill to Block Federal and State Limits on Gun Magazine Size
A senate committee must act next: committee consideration.
No action since September 2025
Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works
People who were previously convicted or charged solely for possessing high-capacity magazines under state or local laws could see their legal situations affected, though the bill does not explicitly address retroactive relief. Going forward, one fewer category of firearm-related offense would exist, meaning fewer people would face criminal charges related to magazine possession.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.
Introduced in Senate
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.

Representative Tony Wied (R-WI) introduced the FIRE Act to nullify magazine capacity restrictions at federal, state, and local levels. The bill aims to protect gun owners from a 'patchwork' of state laws that criminalize standard-capacity magazines holding more than 10 rounds.
The article criticizes the FIRE Act (H.R. 4546) introduced by Rep. Tony Wied, noting it would bar any level of government from restricting magazine capacity for weapons like the AR-15. It argues the bill would nullify strict public safety laws in states like New Jersey and New York.

Congressman Tony Wied introduced the Freedom from Improper Regulation and Enforcement (FIRE) Act to prohibit federal agencies and state/local governments from enacting or enforcing magazine capacity restrictions, seeking a uniform national standard for firearm accessories.
No votes recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
FIRE Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.