Senate Bill Would Require Supreme Court Ethics Code, Gift Limits, and Public Complaint Process

Supreme Court and Judicial Conference start public process to write new ethics codes

People would be able to see and comment on proposed ethics rules before they are finalized, which can shape what conduct is allowed or banned.

Judicial investigation panels begin reviewing and, when needed, investigating complaints

Some complaints could lead to public reports and recommendations, which can pressure changes in Court rules or conduct even if a justice is not formally punished.

Supreme Court posts ethics rules online in searchable, downloadable form

Regular people, journalists, and lawyers could more easily look up what the ethics rules say and what related guidance exists.

New disqualification (recusal) triggers start applying in federal courts

In more situations involving gifts, income, reimbursements, or nomination/confirmation spending and lobbying, a judge/justice would have to step aside, and parties must be notified when a potential conflict is discovered.

New process for reviewing disqualification motions begins (including staying cases during review)

If you file a supported motion to disqualify a judge, the case may pause while a separate panel reviews it, which can protect fairness but also slow the case.

Annual amicus disclosure audits and every-other-year compliance studies begin producing reports

Over time, Congress and the public would get regular updates about how often judges step aside and whether courts are following the rules, which can drive further reforms.