Skip to content
Govbase
Govbase
Congress·Passed House·H.Res. 294

Scheduling Votes on Banking Rules, Court Power, and Voter Registration

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

12 months ago·View on Congress.gov

Stalled

No legislative action in over 90 days.

Legislative Progress

House
Senate
President
Law

Key Points

  • This resolution is a procedural step that sets the schedule and rules for the House of Representatives to debate and vote on four separate pieces of legislation.
  • Two of the measures aim to cancel new government regulations that would limit overdraft fees at large banks and increase oversight of digital payment apps like Venmo or PayPal.
  • One bill would limit the power of local federal courts to issue orders that stop government actions or laws from being enforced nationwide while a legal case is still ongoing.
  • The final bill would change federal law to require people to provide physical proof of U.S. citizenship, such as a birth certificate or passport, when they register to vote in federal elections.
  • Because this is a procedural move, it does not pass these laws immediately; it simply clears the path for the House to hold final discussions and official votes on each topic.

Milestones

11 actions
Apr 8, 2025House

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Apr 8, 2025House

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473)

Apr 8, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473: 2)

Apr 8, 2025House

On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).

Apr 8, 2025House

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)

Vote Results

2 votes
HousePassedProceduralApr 8, 2025

On Ordering the Previous Question

213
211
Democrat
0211 · 2
Republican
2130 · 7
View full roll call
HousePassedApr 8, 2025

On Agreeing to the Resolution

213
211
Democrat
0210 · 3
Republican
2131 · 6
View full roll call

Related Bills

7 bills
S.J.Res. 18Related bill

A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions".

May 9Became Public Law No: 119-10.

S.J.Res. 28Related bill

A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications".

May 9Became Public Law No: 119-11.

H.R. 1526Related bill

NORRA of 2025

Apr 10Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

H.R. 22Procedurally related

SAVE Act

Apr 10Received in the Senate.

H.Res. 282Related bill

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Apr 1Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

H.Res. 293Procedurally related

Providing for the announcement of pairs from a written list furnished to the Clerk, and for other purposes.

Apr 8Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 294, H. Res. 293 is considered passed House. (consideration: CR H1481; text: CR H1481)

H.Res. 287Related bill

Providing for the consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res 24, H.R. 1526, and H.R. 22.

Apr 1Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

Source Information

Document Type

Congressional Bill

Official Title

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Bill NumberHRES 294
Congress119th Congress
ChamberHouse of Representatives
Latest ActionMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsor

Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.