Rep. Foster Introduces Investor Choice Act to Ban Forced Arbitration in Stock Markets
The House Committee on Financial Services received this bill on June 25, 2026. It has not moved since that date and remains under committee review. Most bills do not receive a vote at this stage, so the proposal is currently stalled.
Companion bill: Sen. Merkley and Democrats Push to Ban Mandatory Arbitration for Investors →While it protects consumers, similar bills often face strong opposition from the financial industry and usually struggle to get enough support in a divided Congress.
This bill’s path across every version that has carried it.
Companion
Identical companion bill S. 4937 (119th) was introduced in the other chamber.
S. 4937 (119th) →Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works
Small business owners who invest personal or business funds through brokers or investment advisers would gain the right to take disputes to court instead of being forced into arbitration. This is a benefit when they are cheated. However, small businesses that are publicly listed issuers would face new restrictions on using arbitration clauses in shareholder agreements, potentially increasing their litigation costs.
“it shall be unlawful for any broker, dealer, funding portal, or municipal securities dealer to enter into, modify, or extend an agreement with customers or clients of that entity with respect to a future dispute between the parties that-- ``(1) mandates arbitration for that dispute”
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Introduced in House
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.
No votes or news coverage recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
Investor Choice Act of 2026
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.