SHADOW Act

Key Points

• The bill requires the Supreme Court to explain in writing why it grants or denies emergency stays. Right now, the Court can issue these orders without telling the public its reasoning. Under this bill, justices must publish their reasoning on the public docket immediately or within 7 days in extreme emergencies.
• Before blocking a lower court ruling, the Supreme Court would need to find that someone faces specific, concrete, and irreparable harm that goes beyond just the effects of the stay itself. This raises the bar for when the Court can step in on an emergency basis.
• Emergency orders from the Court could no longer be treated as binding legal precedent for future cases. The bill limits these stays so they only apply to the specific dispute at hand, preventing them from quietly shaping the law without full briefing and argument.
• The bill also tightens the rules for the All Writs Act, which the Court uses to issue broader emergency orders. Under the new rules, the Court could only issue such writs when there is a critical and exigent circumstance involving an indisputably clear legal right, and must explain its reasoning publicly.
• The bill was introduced by Rep. Raskin and referred to the House Judiciary Committee. It targets what legal experts call the 'shadow docket,' where the Supreme Court makes consequential decisions on politically charged topics without full transparency.

Impact Analysis

Govbase has not yet run an impact analysis on this legislation.