Rules for Court-Appointed Monitors
The House passed this bill in May 2026 and sent it to the Senate. It is now waiting for the Senate Judiciary Committee to review it. Because the Senate often does not schedule House bills for a vote, it is unclear if this bill will move forward.
219–204
The bill passed the House with support but faces an uncertain future in the Senate where some may worry it limits civil rights oversight.
Govbase has not yet run an impact analysis on this legislation.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173).
The House of Representatives voted to approve this bill. It now goes to the Senate.
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 172).
On Motion to Recommit
On Passage
Republicans introduced the Monitor Accountability Act to curb the power of court-appointed monitors. The bill proposes a five-year limit on monitorships and requires the court system to establish maximum fees, addressing concerns over the cost and duration of federal oversight.
A new Republican-led bill seeks to overhaul the federal monitorship system by capping fees and limiting monitors to five-year terms. The legislation also encourages monitors to provide pro bono services and prohibits them from holding multiple appointments at once.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
Monitor Accountability Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.