Skip to content
Govbase
Govbase
Congress·In Committee·H.R. 7601

No Immunity for Glyphosate Act

Bipartisan Bill Aims to Strip Legal Immunity from Glyphosate Manufacturers and Allow New Lawsuits

about 2 months ago·View on Congress.gov

Legislative Progress

House
Senate
President
Law

Key Points

  • This bill, introduced by a bipartisan group in Congress, aims to make it easier for people to sue companies that make or sell glyphosate-based weedkillers. It specifically blocks a recent Executive Order that attempted to protect the supply of these chemicals for national defense purposes.
  • The law would stop the government from using any taxpayer money to carry out that Executive Order. This means the government could not use special emergency powers to help companies produce these chemicals or shield them from legal responsibility for health issues.
  • The bill allows anyone who has become sick or died from exposure to these chemicals to sue the manufacturers in federal court. Families could seek money for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering, as well as 'punitive damages' meant to punish the companies for wrongdoing.
  • Crucially, the bill removes 'immunity' protections. Usually, if a company is making something for the government during a national emergency, they are protected from being sued. This bill says those protections do not apply to glyphosate, even if the company was following a direct government order.
  • This change would apply to everyone, including people who are already in the middle of a lawsuit or those who were hurt by these chemicals years ago. It also ensures that people can still use state laws to sue these companies if they choose.
HealthcareAgricultureCriminal Justice

Impact Analysis

Personal Impact

Life & Work

Small businesses that manufacture, distribute, or sell glyphosate-based herbicides would lose legal immunity protections under this bill. They could face lawsuits even if they were following government directives. Landscaping companies, agricultural supply stores, and small chemical distributors could all be considered 'covered entities' subject to civil liability. This creates significant legal exposure for small businesses in the herbicide supply chain.

3
2
2
5
-3
ImpactCertaintyScopeDurationSentiment

Disabilities

Broader Impacts

Score
Scores: -5 (harmful) to +5 (beneficial)Short-term: 0-2 yearsLong-term: 10-30 years

Milestones

2 milestones2 actions
Feb 20, 2026House

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 20, 2026

Introduced in House

The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.

Votes

No votes have been recorded for this legislation yet.

News

The Boston GlobeCenter Left

A Trump order protected a weedkiller. And also a weapon of war. - The Boston Globe

news_articleCenter Right

Massie says US 'under siege' by Roundup maker Bayer

news_articleCenter Left

Will MAHA turn on Trump? How his executive order feels like 'betrayal'

news_articleCenter

Trump admin goes back on core pillar of MAHA agenda

news_articleCenter

Massie seeks to undo Trump's pro-glyphosate executive order

Source Information

Document Type

Congressional Bill

Official Title

No Immunity for Glyphosate Act

Bill NumberHR 7601
Congress119th Congress
ChamberHouse of Representatives
Latest ActionReferred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsor

Cosponsors

(7)
D: 4R: 3

Political Response

Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.