Congress·In Committee·H.R. 6222

ROTOR Act

House Panel Reviews ROTOR Act to Mandate Aircraft Tracking Tech by 2031

7 months ago·View on Congress.gov·Read full text

Part of: Congress Pushes New FAA Mandates for Universal Anti-Collision Technology

⏸

Stalled

No legislative action in over 90 days.

Legislative Progress

House

Senate

President

Law

Key Points

This bill requires almost all airplanes and helicopters to install advanced tracking technology by the end of 2031. This tool gives pilots a digital map of the sky, showing them exactly where other nearby aircraft are located to help prevent mid-air crashes.
The policy stops government and military pilots from turning off their tracking signals during routine training flights or when carrying lower-level officials. Currently, some missions allow pilots to go dark, but this bill narrows those rules to ensure more transparency in the sky.
The Federal Aviation Administration must conduct deep safety reviews at major airports, starting with Reagan National in Washington, D.C. These reviews will look at how military, police, and medical helicopters interact with commercial airliners to find ways to make flight paths safer.
To help owners of smaller aircraft, the government must find low-cost ways for them to follow these rules. This includes allowing portable devices or tablet apps that show traffic data, rather than requiring expensive built-in equipment for every small plane.
The military and the Federal Aviation Administration will be required to share more safety data with each other. This includes reporting near-misses and other incidents so both groups can work together to fix dangerous flight patterns before an accident happens.

Infrastructure TransportationNational Security Foreign Policy

Impact Analysis

Personal Impact

Small business owners who own or operate aircraft — including charter operators, flight schools, agricultural aviation, and private plane owners — must equip their planes with ADS-B In technology by December 31, 2031. For smaller aircraft under 12,500 pounds, the FAA must identify low-cost alternatives like portable receivers and tablet displays. While this adds a compliance cost, it also significantly improves safety by giving pilots real-time awareness of nearby traffic. Operators can also request up to one extra year if they demonstrate progress toward compliance.

-1

ImpactCertaintyScopeDurationSentiment

-1

ImpactCertaintyScopeDurationSentiment

State Impacts

StateScoreImpactCertaintyScopeDurationSentiment

Scores: 1 = low, 5 = highSentiment: -5 to +5 (net benefit)

Milestones

3 milestones4 actions

Nov 21, 2025House

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.

Nov 20, 2025House

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.

Nov 20, 2025

Introduced in House

The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.

Nov 20, 2025

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4853)

Votes

No votes have been recorded for this legislation yet.

Related News

2 articles

MeriTalk·4 months ago

Senate-Passed ROTOR Act Fails in House After Pentagon Pulls Support

The ROTOR Act failed in the House after the Pentagon withdrew support, citing 'budgetary burdens and operational security risks.' The bill would have required aircraft to carry GPS-based tracking systems and prevented military pilots from turning off signals during routine training flights.

Center

FLYING Magazine·4 months ago

House Votes Down ROTOR Act

The ROTOR Act failed to garner the two-thirds majority needed for fast-track passage. The bill would have required civilian and military operators to install ADS-B navigation tech. Opponents argued for a competing measure, the ALERT Act, which makes fewer demands on military operators.

Center