Congress Proposes Permanent Mining Ban on 225,000 Acres Near Boundary Waters to Protect Wilderness
This bill is currently sitting in the House Committee on Natural Resources where it has been since January 2025. No action has been taken on the bill for about 17 months, and it is considered stalled. The House committee must decide to review or vote on the bill for it to move forward.
No action since January 2025
This bill’s path across every version that has carried it.
Reintroduced
Reintroduced from H.R. 668 (118th), which died when its Congress ended.
H.R. 668 (118th) →Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works
Mining projects in the region would have created well-paying union jobs in construction and extraction. By permanently banning copper-nickel and other sulfide-ore mining on 225,504 acres of federal land, the bill eliminates potential future employment opportunities for mining trade union workers in northeastern Minnesota.
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced in House
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.
The Senate may vote on a resolution to undo the ban on mining near the Boundary Waters. Rep. Pete Stauber introduced H.J. Res 140 to repeal the moratorium, while supporters like Sen. Tina Smith fight to keep the protections in place.

The House voted to overturn a 20-year ban on mining near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. The resolution nullifies a Biden-era moratorium on 225,000 acres of federal land in the Rainy River Watershed.
No votes or related bills recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
Boundary Waters Wilderness Protection and Pollution Prevention Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.