Skip to content
Congress·Reported·3 months ago

Policy blocks federal bans on lead ammo and fishing tackle on public lands, allows local exceptions

Also known as: Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025

Legislative Progress

✓ Filed
Review
House
Senate
President

Impacts

Mixed Impacts(1)
Federal Employee
Neutral

Key Points

  • Stops federal wildlife and land agencies from banning lead bullets or fishing weights on most public lands and waters open to hunting and fishing
  • Keeps current national rules for waterfowl hunting that already limit lead use in place
  • Allows a local ban only if site data shows wildlife is declining mainly due to lead and the state wildlife agency agrees or has matching rules; the agency must post a public notice
  • Hunters and anglers could keep using cheaper lead gear in many places; others worry lead can poison birds like eagles and harm fish
  • Does not change rules on state or private land; it only affects federal areas open to hunting and fishing
EnvironmentGun PolicyAgriculture

Milestones

6 milestones12 actions
Nov 25, 2025House

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 335.

Nov 25, 2025House

Committee on Agriculture discharged.

Nov 25, 2025

Committee on Agriculture discharged.

Nov 25, 2025House

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-385, Part I.

Nov 25, 2025

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-385, Part I.

What Happens Next

Projected impacts based on AI analysis

As soon as the bill becomes law

Federal agencies can no longer set broad bans on lead ammo or lead tackle across federal hunting/fishing areas (with limited exceptions).

Hunters and anglers are less likely to see sweeping rule changes that force a quick switch to non-lead gear on large areas of federal land or water.

After the law takes effect, when a site-specific problem is identified

If an agency wants a lead restriction in a specific federal area, it must show local field data that lead is the main cause of wildlife decline there and align with or get approval from the state fish and wildlife agency.

Any lead limits that do happen are more likely to be narrow (place-by-place) and take longer, with more coordination with the state.

Whenever a site-specific lead restriction is proposed or finalized

Agencies must publish a Federal Register notice explaining how any site-specific lead restriction meets the bill’s requirements.

The public (including hunters, anglers, and conservation groups) would be able to see the agency’s reasoning and the evidence it cites for that specific place.

Related News

10 articles
Breitbart News·about 1 year ago

Sen. Steve Daines Introduces Bill Blocking Bans on Lead Tackle and Ammo

Coverage of S. 537, the Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025, introduced by Sen. Steve Daines to bar federal agencies from banning lead ammunition and tackle on most public lands and waters.

R+
NRA-ILA·about 1 year ago

Rep. Wittman & Sen. Daines Reintroduce the Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act

Announcement of H.R. 556 and its Senate companion to prevent Interior and Agriculture from banning traditional lead ammo and tackle on federal lands, with limited site-specific exceptions.

R+
NRA-ILA·8 months ago

House Natural Resources Committee Advances Key Hunting Bills

Committee action moves H.R. 556, the Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act, toward a House floor vote, aiming to block broad federal lead ammo and tackle bans on public lands and waters.

R+

Source Information

Document Type

Congressional Bill

Official Title

Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act

Bill NumberHR 556
Congress119th Congress
ChamberHouse of Representatives
Latest ActionPlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 335.

Sponsor

Cosponsors

(83)
R: 83

Analysis generated by AI. While we strive for accuracy, this should not be considered legal or professional advice. Always verify information with official government sources.