Rep. Murphy Introduces the Protecting Patient Access to Cancer and Complex Therapies Act
This bill is currently sitting in the House Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees. It has not moved since July 2025, meaning there has been no action for 12 months. Most bills like this do not receive a committee vote and do not move forward.
This bill tries to fix a specific problem for doctors, but it changes a major part of current drug laws that are very controversial in Congress.
This bill’s path across every version that has carried it.
Scores run from -100 (strongly harmful) to +100 (strongly beneficial) for each group, combining impact, certainty, scope, and duration ratings of 1-5. How impact scoring works
Independent oncology practices and small medical clinics that administer Part B drugs would continue receiving the full ASP+6% reimbursement rate. Without this bill, the lower negotiated payment rate could squeeze margins for small practices that purchase drugs upfront and depend on the 6% add-on to cover overhead costs like storage, staffing, and administration.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sent to a congressional committee for expert review. The committee decides whether this bill moves forward.
Introduced in House
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.
The article discusses the reintroduction of the Protecting Patient Access to Cancer and Complex Therapies Act on July 9, 2025. It explains that the bill aims to decouple physician payment from the Maximum Fair Price (MFP) established by the Inflation Reduction Act, which oncologists warn could cause a 'financial disaster' for practices by slashing reimbursements for high-cost cancer drugs.
Reporting on recent developments in April 2026, this article notes that H.R. 4299 is gaining significant bipartisan support. Industry leaders like Cardinal Health are backing the measure to ensure that community oncology practices remain viable by shifting the financial burden of drug price negotiations from providers to manufacturers via a rebate system.
This policy analysis explores how H.R. 4299 offers a correction to the Inflation Reduction Act's pricing mechanisms. It details the 'rebate rather than cut' model, where manufacturers pay the government's savings as a direct rebate, preserving the community care infrastructure and preventing the closure of rural chemotherapy centers.
No votes recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
Protecting Patient Access to Cancer and Complex Therapies Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.