Skip to content
Govbase
Govbase
Congress·Reported·H.R. 3898

House Committee Advances PERMIT Act to Double Water Permit Terms, Speed Pipeline Approvals

PERMIT Act

3 months ago·View on Congress.gov
⏸

Stalled

No legislative action in over 90 days.

Legislative Progress

✓ House

221–205

Senate
President
Law

Key Points

  • This bill changes how the government handles water pollution permits to make building infrastructure faster. It doubles the length of certain water permits from 5 years to 10 years, meaning businesses and cities would not have to re-apply for permission as often.

    From policy text

    “Section 402(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(b)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``five years'' and inserting ``ten years''.”
    View in full text
  • The policy streamlines the approval process for 'linear' projects like pipelines, power lines, and roads. For these projects, the government would use faster 'nationwide' permits if the environmental impact is below a certain size, such as 3 acres for power lines or half an acre for pipelines.
  • The bill limits which waters the federal government can regulate. It specifically excludes 'ephemeral' streams that only flow after it rains, groundwater, and certain agricultural lands from federal oversight. It also prevents the government from requiring permits for agricultural runoff caused by rain or for certain pesticides already approved for sale.
  • It sets a strict 60-day deadline for people or groups to file lawsuits against new water permits. If a court finds a mistake in how a permit was issued, it generally cannot cancel the permit unless there is an immediate and serious danger to human health or the environment.

    From policy text

    “(B) an action seeking judicial review of an individual permit or general permit issued under this section shall be filed not later than the date that is 60 days after the date on which the permit was issued;”
    View in full text
  • When setting water quality standards, the government would now have to consider whether the necessary cleanup technology is actually available in the U.S. and how much it costs, rather than just focusing on environmental goals.

    From policy text

    “In developing or revising water quality criteria under this subsection, the Administrator shall take into consideration the cost and commercial availability in the United States of treatment technologies (including whether the technologies have been demonstrated at an applicable scale) that may be required to be applied to point sources in order to result in compliance with water quality standards adopted or promulgated under section 303.”
    View in full text
Energy EnvironmentAgricultureInfrastructure Transportation

Impact Analysis

Personal Impact

Scores: 1 = low, 5 = highSentiment: -5 to +5 (net benefit)

State Impacts

Scores: 1 = low, 5 = highSentiment: -5 to +5 (net benefit)

Milestones

6 milestones36 actions
Dec 15, 2025Senate

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Dec 11, 2025House

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Dec 11, 2025House

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 205 (Roll no. 330).

Dec 11, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 205 (Roll no. 330).

Dec 11, 2025House

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 216 (Roll no. 329).

What Happens Next

Projected impacts based on AI analysis

States and agencies must publish water quality certification requirements

Within 30 days of enactment, every state would need to clearly spell out what's needed to get a water quality certification, giving project applicants a clearer roadmap and reducing delays.

Army Corps of Engineers must eliminate permit and jurisdictional determination backlogs

Within 60 days of enactment, the Corps must speed up processing of pending wetlands permits and jurisdictional decisions. This could unlock projects that have been stuck waiting for years.

EPA must review and streamline state permitting program approval rules

Within 180 days, EPA must identify ways to make it easier for states to take over their own wetlands permitting programs, potentially shifting more regulatory control to state governments.

Vote Results

2 votes
HouseFailedAmendmentDec 11, 2025

On Motion to Recommit

210
216
Democrat
210 – 0 · 3
Republican
0 – 216 · 4
View full roll call
HousePassedPassageDec 11, 2025

On Passage

221
205
Democrat
6 – 204 · 3
Republican
215 – 1 · 4
View full roll call

Source Information

Document Type

Congressional Bill

Official Title

PERMIT Act

Bill NumberHR 3898
Congress119th Congress
ChamberHouse of Representatives
Latest ActionRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 936 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.

Sponsor

Cosponsors

(8)
R: 8

Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.