Skip to content
Congress·Reported·3 months ago

House Committee Advances Bill to Speed Up Natural Gas Pipeline Permits Under FERC

Also known as: Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act

Legislative Progress

Filed
Review
House

213184

Senate
President

Impacts

Negative Impacts(1)
Tribal Member
Hurts
Mixed Impacts(6)
Housing Assistance
Neutral
Homeowner
Neutral
Renter
Neutral
Union Member
Neutral
Federal Employee
Neutral
Chronic Illness
Neutral

Key Points

  • Makes the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission the single lead agency for environmental reviews of certain natural gas pipeline approvals.
  • Sets early deadlines for agencies to join the review (about 30–60 days after an application) and limits late “extra” reviews unless truly required by law.
  • Pushes agencies to finish their permits within 90 days after the main environmental review is done, and requires updates and explanations when deadlines slip.
  • Changes how water impacts are handled by removing the usual state water certification requirement and instead letting states suggest conditions that FERC may include.
  • Adds a security check by requiring FERC to consult the Transportation Security Administration about pipeline security and cybersecurity guidance.
EnergyEnvironmentInfrastructureCybersecurity

Milestones

9 milestones28 actions
Dec 15, 2025Senate

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Dec 12, 2025House

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Dec 12, 2025House

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 184 (Roll no. 334). (text: CR H5814-5816)

Dec 12, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 184 (Roll no. 334).

Dec 12, 2025House

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 194 - 204 (Roll no. 333).

What Happens Next

Projected impacts based on AI analysis

After the bill becomes law

FERC starts running the pipeline/LNG environmental review as the single lead agency under the bill’s rules

Applicants and the public would see one main federal environmental review process to follow, instead of multiple lead reviews

0–30 days after an application is filed

Within 30 days after a company applies, FERC identifies all relevant federal, state, local, and Tribal reviewers/consulting governments

Key governments get brought in early, which can reduce late surprises but also starts the clock sooner

Around day 45 after an application is filed

Within 45 days after a company applies, FERC invites identified agencies and governments to join as “participating agencies”

Agencies that don’t opt in on time risk losing the ability to add comments to the official review record later

Around day 60 after an application is filed

Within 60 days after a company applies, FERC designates participating agencies unless they formally decline

This locks in who is “in the process” and who is mostly out, shaping what input is considered

During the environmental review and permitting process

States/interstate water agencies propose water-protection conditions through FERC instead of issuing a separate Section 401 certification

Water concerns would be handled as proposed conditions inside the federal approval, with FERC deciding what gets included

Within 90 days after FERC completes the environmental review

After FERC finishes its environmental review, other required approvals are scheduled to be completed within 90 days (unless another law sets a different schedule)

Decisions on related permits could come faster once the main review is done, reducing waiting time for projects

Repeated throughout application review; missed-deadline notice within 5 days

Agencies send progress updates to FERC at least every 90 days and must report missed deadlines to Congress

More public accountability and pressure to meet timelines; also more paperwork for agencies

As applications requiring multiple approvals move through review

FERC posts a public online tracking page for multi-permit projects (schedule, actions, due dates, contacts, and delay reasons)

Residents and applicants can more easily see what agency is holding up a decision and who to contact

During FERC’s consideration of an application

FERC consults with the Transportation Security Administration about the applicant’s pipeline security and cybersecurity practices

Security expectations may be addressed earlier; companies may need to show stronger protections before approval

Vote Results

2 votes
HouseFailedAmendmentDec 12, 2025

On Motion to Recommit

194
204
Democrat
1940 · 19
Republican
0204 · 15
View full roll call
HousePassedPassageDec 12, 2025

On Passage

213
184
Democrat
7182 · 24
Republican
2062 · 12
View full roll call

Related News

2 articles

Source Information

Document Type

Congressional Bill

Official Title

Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act

Bill NumberHR 3668
Congress119th Congress
ChamberHouse of Representatives
Latest ActionRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 936 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.

Sponsor

Cosponsors

(3)
R: 3

Analysis generated by AI. While we strive for accuracy, this should not be considered legal or professional advice. Always verify information with official government sources.