Congress Proposes Ban on Nationwide Injunctions from Single-Judge Courts
A house committee must act next: committee consideration.
No action since April 2025
This bill’s path across every version that has carried it.
Reintroduced
Reintroduced from H.R. 3163 (118th), which died when its Congress ended.
H.R. 3163 (118th) →Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
The bill was officially filed and given a number. It now enters the legislative queue.
This analysis explores the systemic issue of judge shopping and nationwide injunctions. It specifically evaluates the End Judge Shopping Act, introduced by Sen. Schumer, which focuses on preventing nationwide relief from single-judge divisions by mandating random assignment.
Senate leaders introduced competing bills to address judge shopping. The Democratic 'End Judge Shopping Act' would force random assignments, while the Republican 'SHOP Act' would limit the scope of injunctions to specific parties or jurisdictions.
While covering the passage of the Republican-led 'No Rogue Rulings Act,' the article notes the Democratic alternative, the 'End Judge Shopping Act' introduced by Rep. Mikie Sherrill, which targets the location and assignment of cases rather than the judges' power to issue broad rulings.
No votes or related bills recorded for this bill yet.
Document Type
Congressional Bill
Official Title
End Judge Shopping Act
Analysis generated by AI. Always verify with official sources.