Congress·In Committee·H.R. 1622

Congress Moves to Add Uranium to Critical Minerals List to Boost U.S. Energy Security

Uranium for Energy Independence Act of 2025

about 1 year ago·View on Congress.gov

⏸

Stalled

No legislative action in over 90 days.

Legislative Progress

House

Senate

President

Law

Key Points

Congress would officially treat uranium as a “critical mineral,” even though fuel minerals are usually left off that list.
This would make uranium part of the government’s key materials list going back to the 2022 version, not just future updates.
Being labeled “critical” can steer federal attention and support toward uranium supply chains, like mining and processing in the U.S.
The change is aimed at energy security and reducing reliance on foreign sources of uranium for nuclear power.
It does not directly set new uranium mining rules or spending in this text, but it can influence future permitting and investment decisions.

EnergyNational SecurityTrade

Milestones

2 milestones2 actions

Feb 26, 2025House

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Feb 26, 2025

Introduced in House

What Happens Next

Projected impacts based on AI analysis

After the bill becomes law

Federal agencies begin treating uranium as a “critical mineral” for planning and program decisions

Companies and workers may see uranium projects discussed as higher priority in federal coordination, which can affect how quickly projects move and how supply risks are handled

Related News

2 articles

Financial Times·5 months ago

US adds silver and copper to ‘critical minerals’ list

Covers the Interior Department’s 2025 critical minerals list update and notes uranium was among minerals added—closely tied to the bill’s core aim (uranium as “critical”), though not focused on H.R. 1622 specifically.

Just The News (The Center Square)·about 1 year ago

Virginia congressman seeks to classify uranium as a critical mineral

Directly discusses the Uranium for Energy Independence Act of 2025 (H.R. 1622), its rationale (energy security/supply chains), and potential implications for domestic production and Virginia uranium debates.