Congress·In Committee·H.R. 1036

Congress moves to require faster trafficking reports and mandatory investigations in federal contracting

Ensuring Accountability and Dignity in Government Contracting Act of 2025

about 1 year ago·View on Congress.gov

⏸

Stalled

No legislative action in over 90 days.

Legislative Progress

House

Senate

President

Law

Key Points

Contractors and grantees would have to turn in anti-trafficking compliance plans when they certify, not only when asked.
If a contractor or subcontractor finds trafficking-related misconduct during a contract, they must quickly report what happened and what they did to fix it.
When a report is filed, the agency Inspector General would be required to investigate the misconduct and the contractor’s fix.
Agencies could pause payments until the contractor takes proper steps to address the problem, and could move toward suspension or blocking future contracts.
The budget office would report to Congress within 18 months on higher-risk contracting checks, simpler reporting, and better training tracking.

Labor EmploymentTradeNational SecurityForeign PolicyConsumer Protection

Impact Analysis

Personal Impact

How this policy affects specific groups of people

Mixed Impacts(1)

Federal Employee

Neutral

Milestones

2 milestones2 actions

Feb 5, 2025House

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Feb 5, 2025

Introduced in House

What Happens Next

Projected impacts based on AI analysis

Soon after the law takes effect (typically when agencies update contract/grant instructions)

Contractors and grant recipients begin submitting anti-trafficking compliance plans with each required certification

Organizations doing federal work may need to update templates and internal processes so they can provide the plan every time they certify compliance, not only when an agency asks.

Immediately after enactment for covered contracts/grants moving forward

New incident-reporting duty kicks in during federal contract/grant performance

If a company learns trafficking-related conduct happened during the project, it must promptly report what happened and what it did to fix it, which can trigger investigations and possible payment pauses.

As soon as incident reports start coming in after enactment

Inspectors General investigate when a recipient submits a trafficking-incident report

Reported incidents are more likely to lead to a formal investigation instead of being handled quietly, raising the chance of enforcement actions and contractor consequences.

When an agency determines corrective actions are not adequate

Agencies may pause payments until a contractor takes appropriate remedial action

Companies that don’t fix problems quickly could face cash-flow pressure, and projects may slow down while corrective actions are verified.

No later than 18 months after enactment

OMB delivers a report to Congress on targeting higher-risk contracts, streamlining reporting, and tracking training

This can lead to future changes like extra checks for certain products/services and locations, simpler reporting forms, and stronger expectations that contracting staff complete anti-trafficking training.